People v. Arlington
California Supreme Court
The hill of exceptions stated: “For the purpose of this hill of exceptions this was all the evidence offered by the prosecution that hears upon the defendant’s exceptions 'hereinafter to he stated. But other evidence was introduced which with the 'evidence herein set forth was sufficient to sustain the verdict.” Further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Defendant was charged with the crime of grand larceny and of two prior convictions for the like offense. He was found guilty by the jury, and the court sentenced him to imprisonment in the state prison during his natural life. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. There is no brief for respondent. Appellant’s points relate exclusively to the instructions of the court.
1. The point first presented arises on the following instruction: “I instruct you, gentlemen of the jury, that a witness false in one part of his or her…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- People v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. PlylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Isaac & Rebecca Thomas v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. DowdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Headlee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. LonnenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. DavenportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.