Legal Opinion

People v. Davenport

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1910No. Crim. No. 118PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. A. Hawkins, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

Appellant seeks a reversal of the judgment - and the order denying his motion for a new trial upon the grounds that the court committed error in the giving and refusing of instructions and in its rulings upon the admissibility of evidence during the trial, that the district attorney was guilty of prejudicial misconduct, that the demurrer to the information was improperly overruled and the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.

1. The portion of instruction No. 4 given by the court, to which criticism is directed, reads as follows: “It is wholly immaterial whether Martha J. McManus,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Hirshfeld v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State v. SouhradaMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. State v. BushIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API