Legal Opinion

Carmody v. City of Elmira

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

A penal ordinance of the city of Elmira provides in substance that bowling alleys shall not be operated unless licensed by the mayor, and in no event on Sunday or between midnight and seven o’clock a. m. on week days.

The petition alleges that Anthony Rossi is operating bowling alleys without such license, that demand was made upon a captain of the Elmira police department that said ordinance be enforced *917against said Rossi but that no action was taken. The petitioners further allege that they are taxpayers owning residential property adjoining said bowling alleys. They ask that the respondents…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Pumpyansky v. . KeatingNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Commonwealth v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. International Railway Co. v. SchwabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. People ex rel. Clapp v. ListmanNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  5. People ex rel. Weatherwax v. WattNew York Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cortellini v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Leland v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Perazzo v. LindsayNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1978
  5. Perazzo v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API