Legal Opinion

Cortellini v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, asking for a peremptory order directed against the city of Niagara Falls, N. Y., and two of its officials. It is in the nature of a mandamus proceeding. The remedy sought herein is extraordinary and the petitioner must show that he has a legal right to the relief asked.

The petitioner herein alleges that as a citizen and taxpayer he has “ an inherent interest in the enforcement of the Building Code and other ordinances of the City of Niagara Falls ” and that he is interested in this proceeding because he is the owner of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campbell v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Matter of Walsh v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Matter of Towers Man. Corp. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. People ex rel. Clapp v. ListmanNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  5. People ex rel. Clapp v. ListmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Posner v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. Fried v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Leland v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Unitarian Universalist Church v. ShortenNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Thomas v. City of Buffalo Inspections DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API