Legal Opinion

Perazzo v. Lindsay

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCharles G. Tierney, J.

This is an article 78 (CPLR) proceeding, in the nature of mandamus, wherein petitioners, property owners and residents of MacDougal Street in the area known as G-reenwich Village, seek an order directing respondents, the Mayor, Commissioner of Licenses, and Police Commissioner of the City of New York, to enforce certain provisions of the Administrative Code of the City of New York and Penal Law of the State of New York relating to the operation and *768maintenance of so-called “ coffee houses ” and the preservation of public order in that street and vicinity.

The gravamen of this application has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. International Railway Co. v. SchwabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. People ex rel. Clapp v. ListmanNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People ex rel. Clapp v. ListmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Cortellini v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blaikie v. LindsayNew York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API