Legal Opinion · Dissent

Perazzo v. Lindsay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1968Published

1DissentCapozzoli, J.

The petitioners-respondents, in paragraph 17 of their petition, have set forth “ That the respondents have declined to utilize the provision of a civil penalty in Section B32-320.0(c) of the Administrative Code to punish violations of Subdivisions (a) of Section B32-311.0 of the Administrative Code ”. The answer of the respondents-appellants, by failing to deny, admits this allegation. The petitioners, in paragraph 2(h) of their reply to the answer of the respondents, specifically call attention to such admission.

An examination of the Administrative Code of the City of New York discloses that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. People ex rel. Weatherwax v. WattNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People ex rel. Weatherwax v. WattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. Carmody v. City of ElmiraNew York Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API