Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1936No. 26111PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Ruth Murphy, a minor seven years of age, by her father and next friend, brought an action in the Court of Common Pleas for damages for injuries received by her when struck by a truck operated by an agent of The Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. while she was returning from school and was attempting to cross Behwood avenue near its intersection at 140th street, Cleveland.

Motion for judgment was interposed by the defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s case, as well as at the conclusion of all of the evidence, both of which motions were overruled and the case was submitted to the jury,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hocking Valley Mining Co. v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Michigan-Ohio-Indiana Coal Assn. v. NighOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Cincinnati Goodwill Industries v. NeuermanOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Webster v. Pullman Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Hubbuch v. City of SpringfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Price v. McCoy Sales & Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Durbin v. Humphrey Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Wagner v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. HuntsmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API