Legal Opinion

Webster v. Pullman Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1935No. 14489 & 14490PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SHERICK, J.

The plaintiff in error maintains that the trial court was guilty of a gross abuse of its discretion in its finding upon the respective motions, and that thereby the court deprived him arbitrarily and unlawfully of his substantia] right to judgment upon the jury’s verdict. He is met in this court with a motion asking for dismissal of the proceedings, predicated upon the assumption that the trial court entered no judgment or final order from which error may be prosecuted to this court and hence this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the same. We readily confess…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elston v. McGlauflinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Ralph v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Berlandi v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Klein v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Birman v. SproatOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Murphy v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API