Legal Opinion

Durbin v. Humphrey Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1938No. 26628PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The sustaining of appellee’s motion for a new trial, after setting aside a judgment rendered in favor of appellant upon its motion for a directed verdict, took away appellant’s right to have final judgment entered in its favor, and is a final order from which appeal may be prosecuted. Jacob Laub Baking Co. v. Middleton, 118 Ohio St., 106, 160 N. E., 629; Hocking Valley Mining Co. v. Hunter, 130 Ohio St., 333, 199 N. E., 184; Michigan-Ohio-Indiana Coal Assn. v. Nigh, 131 Ohio St., 405, 3 N. E. (2d), 355; Murphy v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 132 Ohio St., 68, 4 N. E. (2d), 983.

It is the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Jacob Laub Baking Co. v. MiddletonOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hocking Valley Mining Co. v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Michigan-Ohio-Indiana Coal Assn. v. NighOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. HuffOhio Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Price v. McCoy Sales & Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Smith v. Zone CabsOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Warren People's Market Co. v. Corbett & SonsOhio Supreme Court · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API