Legal Opinion

State v. Huntsman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1969No. 68-547PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

This appeal presents the question whether the state may appeal in a criminal case pursuant to Sections 2953.02 to 2953.14, inclusive, of the Revised Code, from the action of a trial judge in granting a defendant’s motion for a new trial.1

*208At the outset, it should be noted that this court has only recently been persuaded to the view that an order granting a new trial constitutes a final appealable order. Price v. McCoy Sales & Service, Inc., 2 Ohio St. 2d 131.

That question, prior to the Price case had been presented to this court on numerous former occasions, but always within a civil, rather…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. City of Euclid v. HeatonOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Jacob Laub Baking Co. v. MiddletonOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Youngstown Municipal Ry. Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. RudgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Colvin v. Abbey's Restaurant, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Donofrio v. Amerisure InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API