Legal Opinion
Gebresalassie v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 18, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-0762PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs, six individual taxicab drivers and the Washington D.C. Metro Taxi Operators Association, bring suit against the District of Columbia on behalf of themselves and on behalf of a putative class of District of Columbia taxicab drivers, claiming that the District’s Vehicle-for-Hire Innovation Amendment Act of 2014 is unconstitutional. Specifically, they claim that the statutory scheme creates a two-tiered system for regulating taxicabs and digitally dispatched transportation services, such as Uber and Lyft, and that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Newark Cab Association v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Alemu v. Dep't of For-Hire VehiclesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Desoto Cab Co. v. PickerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Melrose Credit Union v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Alemu v. Department of for Hire VehiclesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.