Legal Opinion
Desoto Cab Co. v. Picker
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 12, 2017No. Case No. 15-cv-04375-EMCPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Desoto Cab Company, Inc., d/b/a Flywheel Taxi (“Flywheel”), has filed a suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”), in their official capacities only.1 Flywheel, a “traditional” taxi company, asserts a § 1983 equal protection claim against the CPUC based on the agency’s assertion of jurisdiction over new transportation carriers such as Uber, Lyft, and Sidecar. Flywheel contends that these so-called…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Newark Cab Association v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Melrose Credit Union v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Miadeco Corp. v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- Overton v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Checker Cab Phila. v. Phila. Parking Auth.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.