Legal Opinion
BATISTA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1997No. ID 3321PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3321 In re Juan BATISTA-HERNANDEZ, Respondent File A91 548 877 - Oakdale Decided July 15, 1997 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The offense of accessory after the fact to a drug-trafficking crime, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3
(Supp. V 1993), is not considered an inchoate crime and is not sufficiently related to a con- trolled substance violation to support a finding of deportability pursuant to section 241(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2)(B)(i) (1994). (2) The respondent’s…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- JOSEPHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- ROLDANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- Marlene Jaggernauth v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- ESPINOZABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- Rafael Lara-Chacon v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.