Legal Opinion
ROLDAN
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1999No. ID 3377PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3377 In re Mauro ROLDAN-Santoyo, Respondent File A90 286 629 - Boise Decided March 3, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Under the statutory definition of “conviction” provided at section 101(a)(48)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(48)(A) (Supp. II 1996), no effect is to be given in immigration proceedings to a state action which purports to expunge, dismiss, cancel, vacate, discharge, or otherwise remove a guilty plea or other record of guilt or con- viction by operation of a…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Carlos Gonzalez v. Cynthia J. O'connell, District Director, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Pinho v. Atty Gen USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Mohammed Salim Ali v. U.S. Atty. GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Jesus Aaron Cazarez-Gutierrez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.