Legal Opinion

JOSEPH

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1999No. ID 3398PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3398 In re Samuel JOSEPH, Respondent File A90 562 326 - York Decided May 28, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) For purposes of determining the custody conditions of a lawful permanent resident under section 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act,

8 U.S.C. § 1226

(Supp. II 1996), and

8 C.F.R. § 3.19(h)(2)(ii) (1999), a lawful permanent resident will not be considered “properly included” in a mandatory detention category when an Immigration Judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals finds, on the basis of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. AguilarSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. BATISTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
  3. Cover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. United States v. Leemunth Peter JohnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Nielsen v. PreapSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Igor Borbot v. Warden Hudson County CorrectioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. Diop v. Ice/Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API