Kenty v. Transamerica Premium Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
A motion to dismiss can be granted only where the party opposing the motion is unable to prove any set of facts which would entitle him to the relief requested. When reviewing a complaint under this standard, the factual allegations contained in the complaint are taken as true. O’Brien v. Univ. Community Tenants Union, Inc. (1975), 42 Ohio St.2d 242, 71 O.O.2d 223, 327 N.E.2d 753; Bridges v. Natl. Eng. & Contracting Co. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 108, 112, 551 N.E.2d 163, 167. When reviewing a case on a motion to dismiss, the reviewing court must construe all material allegations in the complaint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- LeFort v. Century 21-Maitland Realty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Westway Trading Corp. v. River Terminal Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by261 opinions
- Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & HaddenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Morrow v. Reminger & Reminger Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.