Legal Opinion

Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1986No. 84-1909PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDahling, J.

Ohio has long adhered to the general rule that “either party to an oral employment-at-will agreement may terminate the employment relationship for any reason which is not contrary to law.” Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co. (1985), 19 Ohio St. 3d 100, 103. “* * * Employment contracts can be terminated at will for any cause, at any time whatsoever, even if done in gross or reckless disregard of any employee’s rights.” Peterson v. Scott Constr. Co. (1982), 5 Ohio App. 3d 203, 205; Wolf v. First National Bank of Toledo (C.P. 1980), 20 O.O. 3d 262, 263; Dadas v. Prescott, Ball & Turben (N.D. Ohio…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State ex rel. Alford v. Willoughby Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Royce v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Peterson v. Scott Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Clark v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Josephine GAGNÉ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kenty v. Transamerica Premium InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API