Legal Opinion

Mary C. McKenzie v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., D/B/A South Central Bell Telephone Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2000No. 99-5584PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant, Mary McKenzie, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Defendant-Appellee, BellSouth Telecommunications Inc. (“BellSouth”), in her action alleging that BellSouth harassed and discharged her in violation of the qui tam 1 provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3730. Section 3730(h) of the FCA prohibits retaliation against employees engaged in the protected activity of investigating possible fraud against the United States government. McKenzie’s § 3730(h) retaliation claim was one part of her original qui…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. Richard M. Yuhasz v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States of America, Ex Rel. Richard Williams v. Martin-Baker Aircraft Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  3. United States Ex Rel. Karvelas v. Melrose-Wakefield HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. Dennis Glynn v. EDO CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. McAllan v. Von EssenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API