Legal Opinion

Dennis Glynn v. EDO Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2013No. 12-1160PublishedCited by 246 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge AGEE and Judge WYNN joined.

OPINION

GREGORY, Circuit Judge:

In this False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, retaliation action, Plaintiff-Appellant Dennis Glynn (“Glynn”) argues that Defendant-Appellee Impact Science & Technology (“1ST”) and its parent company, EDO Corporation, fired Glynn because he reported 1ST to the government for what he believed to be fraudulent conduct. We agree with the district court that Glynn was not engaged in activity that qualified him for protection under the FCA’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Football Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  5. Bonds v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by246 opinions

  1. Anthony Dash v. Floyd Mayweather, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. Dustin Williamson v. Bryan StirlingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  3. Roger Hoschar v. Appalachian Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. Carey Hixson v. Michael MoranCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  5. Snider International Corporation v. Town of Forest Heights, MDCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014

241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API