Legal Opinion

Stefanovic v. University of Tennessee

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 8, 1996No. 3:95-cv-231PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JARVIS, District Judge.

On April 8,1996, the court dismissed all of plaintiffs claims against the individual defendants with the exception of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VTI claims [see Docs. 21 and 22], The court took this action, in part, because after defendants filed their original motion to dismiss [Doc. 12], the court granted plaintiff leave to amend his complaint to state a Bivens cause of action1 against the individual defendants in their individual capacities [see Doc. 14, p. 3 (marginal entry) ]. Hence, the court left resolution of plaintiffs Fourteenth…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Sofco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API