Legal Opinion
Smith v. Sofco, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 31, 1996No. 1:94CV2420Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
WELLS, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the motions to dismiss filed by all of the defendants. The Court has advised the parties that it would consider the defendants’ motions as motions for summary judgment, and invited plaintiff to respond on this basis. Neither party has submitted evidence in support of or in opposition to the motions.
All defendants except Sofco of Ohio, Inc. argue that they are not proper parties to this action because they were not named in the “right to sue letter” which the Equal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Glus v. G. C. Murphy Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Romain v. KurekCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Jones v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 299Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Knafel v. Pepsi-Cola Bottlers of Akron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.