Kenda Rubber Indus. Co., Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
CARMAN, Judge:
Before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for judgment upon the agency record, pursuant to Rule 56.1, in this antidumping investigation. Defendant United States opposes the motion. Plaintiffs ask for a review of the International Trade Commission’s (Commission) determination in Bicycle Tires and Tubes from Taiwan, U.S.I.T.C. Public. 1532, Investigation No. 731-TA-166 (Final) (May 1984), that imports of bicycle tires and tubes from Taiwan are materially injuring industries in the United States.
Plaintiffs challenge the Commission’s determination on basically two grounds. First,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Budd Co. Railway Division v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
- Roquette Freres v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
3Cited by23 opinions
- USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Negev Phosphates, Ltd. v. United States Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.