Legal Opinion
Roquette Freres v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 19, 1984No. Court 82-5-00636PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOE, Judge:
The above entitled action is before the court pursuant to Rule 56.1 cross motions by plaintiffs, Roquette Freres and Roquette Corporation (“Roquette”), and intervenor, Phizer, Inc., each challenging in part the administrative determinations upon the agency record. 1 Plaintiffs challenge the final affirmative determination of the International Trade Administration (“ITA”) with respect to sales at less than fair value of sorbitol from France, and the final affirmative determination of the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) on remand of material injury to an industry in the United…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Royal Business MacHines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
- Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- G. S. Nicholas & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.