Legal Opinion

Budd Co. Railway Division v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 29, 1980No. 80-3-00505PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BOE, Judge:

The plaintiff, The Budd Company, Railway Division, which assembles rail passenger cars as well as manufactures certain components and parts therefor at its plant in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, brings this action under section 516A(1)(D) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 contesting the preliminary determination by the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) of “No Reasonable Indication of Material Injury” in Rail Passenger Cars and Parts Thereof Intended for Use as Original Equipment in the United States from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  4. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  5. USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API