Baedaro v. Caldwell
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.
The plaintiff Harry Baedaro brought this action in the district court for Douglas County for the purpose of obtaining a declaratory judgment declaring the five-ball pinball machine installed in his place of business is not a gambling device within the meaning of section 28-945, R. R. S. 1943, and for an injunction to prohibit the defendants, who are law enforcing officers, from arresting him, confiscating the pinball machine, or interfering with its operation and use. Trial was had. The district court found that there was a justifiable controversy between the plaintiff and defendants and the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. CoatsOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Dussault v. KilburnMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Painter v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Couch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Bayer v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- In re AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Spire v. Strawberries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. Two IGT Video Poker GamesNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.