State v. Two IGT Video Poker Games
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment forfeiting the defendant-appellee IGT Video Poker Game, Model FA180, machines owned by defendant-appellant, Schmit Industries, Inc., to plaintiff-appellee, State of Nebraska.
We begin by noting that actions for forfeiture are generally considered to sound in equity. See, e.g., In re Forfeiture of $30,632.41,184 Mich. App. 677, 459 N.W.2d 99 (1990); Sturm v. Crowley, 131 W. Va. 505, 48 S.E.2d 350 (1948); Robinson Cadillac Motor Car Co. v. Ratekin, 104 Neb. 369, 177 N.W. 337 (1920). This therefore being an equitable action in rem to transfer the title of the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hibben v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Gottsch v. Bank of StapletonNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Robotham Ex Rel. Robotham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. SextonNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Spire v. Strawberries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. FrancoNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.