Legal Opinion

Bayer v. Johnson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1984No. 14314PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

This is an administrative appeal from a decision of the South Dakota Secretary of Revenue (Secretary) which denied Barry E. Bayer’s application for a refund of sales tax paid under protest. The circuit court affirmed the Secretary. We reverse.

Appellant' candidly states he is engaged in the bookmaking business and the facts seem essentially undisputed. SDCL 10-45-5.2, by reference, subjects bookmaking to the retail sales and service tax. 1 Mr. Bayer holds a retail occupational sales tax license for a service business in the area of amusements.

lt is also undisputed that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Rutkin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sharp v. SharpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. BakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Boever v. South Dakota Board of AccountancySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. BonrudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API