Bayer v. Johnson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.
This is an administrative appeal from a decision of the South Dakota Secretary of Revenue (Secretary) which denied Barry E. Bayer’s application for a refund of sales tax paid under protest. The circuit court affirmed the Secretary. We reverse.
Appellant' candidly states he is engaged in the bookmaking business and the facts seem essentially undisputed. SDCL 10-45-5.2, by reference, subjects bookmaking to the retail sales and service tax. 1 Mr. Bayer holds a retail occupational sales tax license for a service business in the area of amusements.
lt is also undisputed that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Rutkin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Sharp v. SharpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Boever v. South Dakota Board of AccountancySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BonrudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.