Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hansen v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1941No. Civ. 6430PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of respondents upon the sustaining of a demurrer to the amended petition of appellant for a writ of mandate, requiring respondents to issue an off-sale distilled spirits license and other licenses described in the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act of the State of California. . (Stats. 1935, chap. 330, as amended; Deering’s Gen. Laws, [1937] Act 3796.)

The original petition was amended after a demurrer thereto was sustained. The demurrer to the amended petition was sustained without leave to amend. Permission to further amend was not requested…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Tulare Water Co. v. State Water CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Foster v. Bd. of Police Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Ritz v. LightstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API