Legal Opinion

Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1961No. S. F. No. 20640PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

— The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (hereinafter called the department) denied an on-sale beer and wine license to applicants Hayes, who thereupon appealed to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (hereinafter called the appeals board). The appeals board reversed the decision of the department. The department, through its director, then brought this mandamus proceeding seeking to compel the appeals board to reverse that board’s decision and to affirm the decision of the department. The trial court entered judgment denying the relief sought, and this appeal by the department…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Stoumen v. ReillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Brill v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Boreta Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Brown v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API