Legal Opinion

Bocook Outdoor Media, Inc. v. Summey Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 7, 1987No. 1060PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Associate Judge:

This case involves claims of violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (SCUTPA) and interference with contractual relations. Bocook Outdoor Media, Inc. (Bocook) and Summey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (Summey) are competitors in the outdoor advertising business. The claims of the parties arise from their competitive practices in obtaining billboard leases in and around Anderson County. Both parties appeal various aspects of the jury verdict. We affirm.

I

Bocook is in the business of renting outdoor advertising space on billboard signs. This is accomplished…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Bonaparte v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. RhoadesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. DeBerry v. McCainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Columbia Outdoor Advertising, Inc. J. Willis Cantey the City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Ward v. Dick Dyer and Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Waldrep Brothers Beauty Supply, Incorporated v. Wynn Beauty Supply Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Hobgood v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API