Legal Opinion

Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Columbia Outdoor Advertising, Inc. J. Willis Cantey the City of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 27, 1992No. 88-1388PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

This case comes before us on remand from the Supreme Court. We must assess whether Omni Outdoor Advertising is entitled to a new trial on several theories of liability not covered by the Supreme Court’s action. We hold that Omni either waived or failed to establish liability on the remaining causes of action in this case.

I

This case stems from allegations made by Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (Omni) that Columbia Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (COA) and the City of Columbia, South Carolina (City), undertook various illegal actions to keep Omni out of the Columbia…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. Sandberg v. Virginia Bankshares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Anita Mason Rowland v. American General Finance, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. Beazer East, Inc. v. Mead CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. California Dental Association v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API