Legal Opinion

Ward v. Dick Dyer and Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 11, 1991No. 23361PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This appeal raises two questions concerning the alleged misconduct of an automobile dealership. Specifically, the questions are whether a purchaser of an automobile may bring an action against the dealership under the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA) and whether the car dealership may allege as a defense an offer to replace or repurchase the car in question. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Eddie and Patricia Ward brought this action against Dick Dyer and Associates, Inc. for the failure to disclose that the car they purchased had been involved…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. RhoadesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Skinner v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  3. Scott v. Mid-Carolina Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Bocook Outdoor Media, Inc. v. Summey Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Anderson v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. RFT Management Co. v. Tinsley & Adams L.L.P.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Dema v. Tenet Physician Services-Hilton Head, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Fields v. Melrose Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API