Legal Opinion
Waldrep Brothers Beauty Supply, Incorporated v. Wynn Beauty Supply Company, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1993No. 92-1802PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:
Business competition produces success and failure; over time, only firms that satisfy their customers will survive. In this diversity case, plaintiff seeks to erect the tort law of South Carolina as a barrier to the forces of market competition. The customers in this case, Redken Laboratories, Inc. and Sebastian International, producers of beauty products, terminated their at-will contracts with plaintiff Waldrep Brothers Beauty Supply for the distribution of their beauty products in South Carolina. They replaced Waldrep shortly thereafter with defendant Wynn…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Duggin v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Charles v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Crandall Corp. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- LaMotte v. Punch Line of Columbia, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Lee v. Chesterfield General Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Soap Co. v. Ecolab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- DP-Tek, Inc. v. AT & T Global Information Solutions Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Sysco Machinery Corporation v. DCS USA CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
- United States Surgical Corp. v. Orris, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- United States v. RosenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.