Legal Opinion

Gardner v. McClusky

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1995No. 92A05-9305-CV-185PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARTEAU, Judge.

Francis Michael Gardner, Thomas E. Gardner and Francis A. Gardner appeal the trial court's judgment discharging the obligation owed to Francis Michael Gardner and Thomas Gardner, secured by a mortgage on Mary Ann MceClusky's ("Mary Ann") farm and the judgment against Francis A. Gardner (Frank Gardner" or "Gardner") in the amount of $300,000. Francis Michael Gardner, Thomas E. Gardner and Francis A. Gardner are referred to collectively as "Defendants."

Because we reverse in part and affirm in part, we address only the following issues:

*31. Whether the trial court erroneously…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. English Coal Co., Inc. v. DurcholzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Shaw v. J. Pollock & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Shimola v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Freeman v. Westland Builders, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Info. Network v. ShireyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Spencer v. E. Liverpool Planning Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Master v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Budget Car Sales v. StottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Budget Car Sales v. StottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API