Legal Opinion

Shimola v. Nationwide Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1986No. 85-1064PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether the $160,000 punitive damages award was properly vacated by the court of appeals. We hold that the award was properly vacated and affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

The court of appeals vacated the trial court’s award of punitive damages “on the ground that the insured failed to prove that he sustained actual damages that stemmed from Nationwide’s failure to honor his claim.” We agree. It is well-established that “ ‘[e]xemplary or punitive damages may not be awarded in the absence of proof of actual damages.’ ” Bishop v. Grdina…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bishop v. GrdinaOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bishop v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Richard v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lucarell v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Cabe v. LunichOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Cooper v. FeeneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API