Legal Opinion

King-Seeley Thermos Company v. Millersville Manufacturing Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 3, 1969No. 18879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a patent infringement suit involving U. S. Patent No. 2,753,694 owned by plaintiff-appellant (King-See-ley) for an ice-making machine. In an opinion published at 296 F.Supp. 247, District Judge Frank Gray, Jr. held that the patent is valid but that under applicable law the patent has not been infringed by defendant-appellee (Millers-ville). Reference is made to the opinion of the District Judge for a detailed statement of facts.

The patent in suit has been held valid in a number of reported decisions. King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Tastee Freeze Industries, Inc., 357 F.2d 875 (7th Cir.),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Refrigerated Dispensers, Inc., Diamond Ice MacHine Company, and the Diamond CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  2. King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Tastee Freez Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  3. King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Millersville Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1968
  4. King-Seeley Corp. v. Cold Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Westwood Chemical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Uniflow Manufacturing Co. And Jefferson Ice Company v. King-Seeley Thermos Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  3. Wayne-Gossard Corp. v. Sondra, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API