King-Seeley Corp. v. Cold Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, District Judge.
Findings of Fact(1) Plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Michigan having its principal office and place of business at Ann Arbor, Michigan.(2) Defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Illinois having its principal office and place of business at Chicago, Illinois, within the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.(3) The Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of the Complaint and the Counterclaim.(4) The predecessor of the plaintiff King-Seeley Corporation, namely, Queen Stove…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Uniflow Manufacturing Co. And Jefferson Ice Company v. King-Seeley Thermos Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- King-Seeley Thermos Company v. Millersville Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Reynolds Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970