Legal Opinion
King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Millersville Manufacturing Co.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided July 9, 1968No. Civ. No. 4899PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FRANK GRAY, Jr., District Judge.
This patent infringement action was instituted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271 by King-Seeley Thermos Company (hereafter King-Seeley), the owner by assignment of U. S. Letters Patent 2,753,694 (hereafter patent 694). The crux of the complaint is that Millersville Manufacturing Company, by the manufacture and sale of its “Sno-Flaker” ice producing machines, has infringed claim 4 of patent 694. Jurisdiction and venue are properly asserted under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338(a) and 1400(b), respectively.
The invention embodied in patent 694, as well as the defendant’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Westwood Chemical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Uniflow Manufacturing Co. And Jefferson Ice Company v. King-Seeley Thermos Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Wayne-Gossard Corp. v. Sondra, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- King-Seeley Thermos Company v. Millersville Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969