Legal Opinion
Kurti v. Becker
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 3, 1999No. AC 17978PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion,
DALY, J.
The defendants, Carolyn H. Becker and Frederick Becker, appeal from the judgment against *336them fohowing a jury trial. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) denied their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and (2) refused to charge the jury as they requested. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On Tuesday, January 25,1994, the eighty-nine year old plaintiff, Alexander Kurti, went to the defendants’ house to play his recorder1 with a group of people who gathered there every Tuesday. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Corcoran v. JacovinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Salaman v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Sokolowski v. Medi Mart, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Salaman v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Sevigny v. Dibble Hollow Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Hall v. CagleMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- James v. Valley-Shore Y.M.C.A., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.