Legal Opinion
Salaman v. City of Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 11, 1998No. SC 15653PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MCDONALD, J.
The named defendant,1 the city of Waterbury (city), appeals from the Appellate Court’s decision reversing the trial court’s judgment granting the city’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Salaman v. Waterbury, 44 Conn. App. 211, 687 A.2d 1318 (1997). There are two certified issues in this appeal: One, “[d]id the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had improperly set aside the verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff because the plaintiff had failed to establish that (1) the city owed a duty to the plaintiffs decedent and (2) that the city…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Bovat v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Kurti v. BeckerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Hudson United Bank v. Cinnamon Ridge Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Macdermid, Inc. v. LeonettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.