Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Pichoir

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1903No. S.F. No. 2877PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an appeal by Ida Amadi, who is admitted to be the' sole heir at law of Henry Pichoir, deceased, from an order of distribution by which the whole of the estate of said decedent is distributed to certain persons named as trustees in a duly probated will of the decedent. The estate of the testator consists of certain real property of the value of about ten thousand dollars, and personal property of the value of about one hundred and forty-two thousand dollars. It does not appear whether or not the decedent had any real property at the date of the will. The main contentions of appellant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cochrane v. . SchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hawley & King v. JamesNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
  4. In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Morffew v. S.F. & San Rafael R.R.California Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Estate of LefrancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. DuffillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. In Re Estate of SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API