Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Brandon
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1929No. Docket No. 6540PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, J., pro tem.
Since the filing of the transcript in this case C. S. Schwartz, the executor of the estate of Jonas Schwartz, was substituted as plaintiff and respondent in the place and stead of Jonas Schwartz, deceased.
The point in this case is: Was a conveyance of property, described in the complaint, made by the appellant, J. F. S. Brandon, to his wife (his co-defendant), Thereza S. Brandon, while he was insolvent, or did such conveyance make him an insolvent, and was such transfer made for the purpose of hindering, delaying, and defrauding the original plaintiff, and for the prevention…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Melvin v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Chalmers v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Tobias v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Marple v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Swartz v. HazlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adams v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Neumeyer v. Crown Funding Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- In Re Mercury Engineering, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
- In Re StrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Pacific Freight Lines v. Pioneer Express Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.