Legal Opinion
Knapp v. Rose
California Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1948No. L. A. 20052PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
About three years after the sale of certain real property under a writ of enforcement, June Knapp and E. W. Knapp, the judgment debtors, sued to set it aside upon the ground that the judgment was one for money and could only be carried into effect by a writ of execution. The appeal from the judgment in their favor presents for decision procedural questions arising out of litigation commenced almost 20 years ago.
In 1929, Lorn Betty recovered a judgment against Ellen Crowder and her son, E. W. Knapp, for $3,000 and costs. After the judgment became final, numerous executions were issued and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Mitchell v. Alpha Hardware & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Estate of AvelineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Lavaysse v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Colver v. W. B. Scarborough Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rose v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Rose v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957