United States Ex Rel. Garst v. Lockheed Integrated Solutions Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint. For the reasons explained below, the motion is granted.
Background
Joseph Garst is a former employee of the United States Department of Veteran Affairs (“VA”) who initiated this qui tarn action against Lockheed Integrated Solutions Company (“Lockheed”) under the False Claims Act (“FCA”). See 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (West Supp.2000). The action seeks to recover damages and civil penalties on behalf of the United States arising from alleged false or fraudulent claims for payment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walid A. Hindo v. University of Health Sciences/the Chicago Medical SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Northrop Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- United States ex rel. Johnson v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1998
- United States ex rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Durcholz v. FKW Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States of America by and Through Joseph E. Garst v. Lockheed-Martin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Goldberg v. Rush University Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Beeler Schad & Diamond, P.C. v. Ritz Camera Centers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- United States Ex Rel. Yannacopolous v. General DynamicsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Galloway v. Chugach Government Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.