Legal Opinion
Brant v. Hester
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 1991No. 45A03-9011-CV-487PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
William Brant, Mercantile National Bank of Indiana and Plum Creek Village Associates appeal a summary judgment and award of damages in favor of Hal Hester, Maurice Checroun, Rudy Kutansky and Donald Stratton ("Buyers"). Three issues are presented for our review:
I. Did the trial court err in granting summary judgment in favor of the Buyers?
II. Did the trial court err in awarding compensatory damages to the Buyers?
III. Did the trial court err in awarding attorney fees to the Buyers?
We affirm the grant of summary judgment and award of compensatory damages. We reverse the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kahn v. CundiffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Kolczynski v. Maxton Motors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Eversole v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Weisman v. Hopf-Himsel, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Holtzclaw v. Bankers Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Nance v. Miami Sand & Gravel, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Crosson v. BerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- D.S.I. v. Natare Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ebersol v. MishlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.