Legal Opinion
Crosson v. Berry
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 15, 2005No. 53A05-0407-409PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, J.
Cathy E. Crosson appeals the judgment against her in a claim for malicious prosecution brought by Thomas A. Berry. Crosson raises three issues, which we consolidate and restate as:
I. Whether the trial court erred by denying Crosson's motion to dismiss under Ind. Trial Rule 12(B)(6); and
Whether the trial court erred by denying Crosson's motion for summary judgment.
*187We affirm.1
The relevant facts follow. In 1998, Crosson was involved in litigation in federal court and was represented by attorney Michael Ausbrook. The federal court scheduled the case for a settlement and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
- City of New Haven v. ReichhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Michael Alexander v. Mark McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Golden Years Homestead, Inc. v. BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- The Estate of Richard A. Mayer, and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty v. Lax, Inc., and David LascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Roukaya Ali v. Alliance Home Health Care, LLC, L.J.L. Enterprises, Inc., and Larry J. LogsdonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Kopka, Landau & Pinkus v. HansenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.