Legal Opinion
Holtzclaw v. Bankers Mutual Insurance Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 1983No. 3-1282A339PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.
Appellant Lourane Holtzclaw brought suit against Bankers Mutual Insurance Company (Bankers). The purpose of the suit was to compel Bankers to honor its insurance contract and reimburse appellant for certain medical and hospital expenses she had incurred. Bankers counterclaimed alleging it had no duty to cover these expenses since appellant had misrepresented certain facts in her application for insurance. Bankers made a motion for summary judgment which was granted by the trial court and Holtzclaw appeals.
Three issues are raised on appeal: 1(1) whether the trial court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. KivelaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Baker v. American States InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Lee v. WestonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- University Casework Systems, Inc. v. BahreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Flynn v. KlinemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American States Insurance Co. v. KigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Bicknell Minerals, Inc. v. TillyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Brant v. HesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re E.L.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Stevens v. ButlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.