Legal Opinion
D.S.I. v. Natare Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 29, 2000No. 49A02-0001-CV-50PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge
Stewart J. Mart, Duraplastic Systems, Inc. (D.S.I.), and Aquatic Renovation Systems, Inc. (A.R.S.) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “D.S.I.” unless otherwise indicated) appeal from an award of attorney fees in favor of Natare Corporation. The appellants present the following consolidated, restated issues for review:
1. Was Natare a “prevailing party” within the meaning of Ind.Code Ann. § 34-52-1-1 (West 1999), such that Natare was eligible for an award of attorney fees under that statute?
2. Did the trial court err in determining that D.S.I.’s action was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aronson v. PriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Indiana State Board of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines Living Center, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Gurnik v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Salcedo v. ToeppIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Fairfield Development, Inc. v. Georgetown Woods Senior Apartments Ltd. PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Hobson Fabricating Corp. v. SE/Z Construction, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Paternity of PEMIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Lakes & Rivers Transfer v. Rudolph Robinson Steel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.