Legal Opinion

Foundation Reserve Insurance v. Esquibel

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1980No. 12093PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Justice.

Foundation Reserve Insurance Company (Foundation) sued for a declaratory judgment and return of money paid under an automobile insurance policy issued to Esquibel. The trial court held that Foundation was liable under the policy, but ordered Esquibel to return a portion of the money he received. We affirm.

This is a matter of first impression in New Mexico regarding the standard for voiding an insurance policy based on a material breach by the insured. Is a substantial and material breach of the insurance contract by the insured sufficient to void his policy, or must the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. M.F.A. Mutual Insurance v. CheekIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. MFA Mutual Insurance Company v. SailorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Chronister Ex Rel. Chronister v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Darcy v. HARTFORD INS. CO. ROYAL GLOBE INS. CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Price Ex Rel. MoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Prince George's County v. Local Government Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Friedland v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API