Legal Opinion
McRae v. Japhet
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 17, 1925No. 8587. [fn*]PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
A statement of the cause as it comes here from the court below, adopted by defendants in error, is thus made in the brief of plaintiffs in error:
“Plaintiffs in error sued in the district court of Harris county to recover a one-third interest in a one-eighth royalty in the oil produced and to be produced from a 15-acre tract, covered by an oil, gas, 'and mineral lease, executed prior to the subdivision and sale thereof to plaintiffs and defendants in error. Plaintiffs in error purchased the north 5 acres of this tract, and the defendants in error the south 10 acres. There has been no…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- Texas Company v. W.H. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- The Texas Company v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Texas Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Caruthers v. LeonardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Japhet v. McRaeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Carlock v. KrugSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Stephenson v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Coates v. De GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- McElvain v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.