Legal Opinion

McRae v. Japhet

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1925No. 8587. [fn*]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

A statement of the cause as it comes here from the court below, adopted by defendants in error, is thus made in the brief of plaintiffs in error:

“Plaintiffs in error sued in the district court of Harris county to recover a one-third interest in a one-eighth royalty in the oil produced and to be produced from a 15-acre tract, covered by an oil, gas, 'and mineral lease, executed prior to the subdivision and sale thereof to plaintiffs and defendants in error. Plaintiffs in error purchased the north 5 acres of this tract, and the defendants in error the south 10 acres. There has been no…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Texas Company v. W.H. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. The Texas Company v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Texas Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Caruthers v. LeonardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Japhet v. McRaeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Carlock v. KrugSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Stephenson v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Coates v. De GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. McElvain v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API